Skip to main content

Adios di Matteo


I met a guy in the gym a couple of days ago. I knew him as one of the regular gymmers and nothing else. He came to me and said, “Bal Thackerey passed away!”. I am in Hyderabad and so is that guy who has if not much only heard stories of the great BT. I grinned at him to which he said “The man passed away and you are laughing, yaar.” To which my only reply was that not much changes in my life and went on with my routine.

Today comes the news of a key figure exiting a club I love. There are comments all over twitter and it has become an altogether familiar story at Chelsea that a manager doesn’t perform and he is shown the door before he knows how to recover. Such is the life of a manager in the club. It is demanding and sometimes cruel.

One of the tweets contained this stat. I quote, “262 - Roberto Di Matteo lasted 262 days as Chelsea manager, longer than Villas-Boas (256), Grant (247) & Scolari (223). Fired.” All names to reckon but faced the wrath of a very ambitious owner who can take nothing less than the perfect score. It is no surprise that he demands his team to win the league and Champions league year after year and that’s been an unflinching desire. Teams have been built with money that can buy 10 to 15 countries in Africa. That’s what the owner says, “I can bring the moon if you want. Get me the silverware.” If you were a Wenger you can get away stating the profitability of the club or the constant new talents that they seem to manufacture as a replacement to the actual result of winning the title or Champions league but with Chelsea you have a clear mandate and the goal is very clear.

The Russian baron has been ruthless in the past in his investment in managers and their removal in surgical precision. He doesn’t believe in giving them time amidst poor results. It is not a case of this or that. It is an absolute result that Chelsea has to achieve under all circumstances. In the quote mentioned above a name was ceremoniously missed. There was a manager with a clear mop of grey hair and he led the club for 2 grueling seasons winning the double of FA and premier league in his first year itself. Carlo is now the manager of PSG who wants Ashley Cole to join him. Amongst all the people who came and went he was the only guy apart from Mourinho who knew what he should do with the club. Rarely come men like the Ancelottis and Mourinhos. Chelsea’s season spiraled down on the firing of Ray Wilkins and Ancelotti who inspite of the team’s poor results brought Chelsea to a No. 2 slot.

All I ask for is a moment of reflection from Roman. The next big manager has never been the solution to the club. Pep is the fanciest name today but nothing assures his success in this club where everything is a stark contrast from his last assignment. What we need is analysis of failures and we seem to have a large pool of managers who failed and enough data points to mull upon as to why this has happened with alarming consistency. What’s the role played by the manager and what is the role played by players who have schemed to get a certain somebody out. Are all cases dissimilar or are there common trends that arise out of this? What’s the secret of success of someone like Sir Alex who can put out an under 20 player and he becomes the next most talked thing if not in the world atleast in England? Is there truth in legacy or footprints left by managers? Like any other profession even in football everybody works for their boss. So who is the boss the players like to work for?

All this retrospection has one starting point. I am going to call it “acceptance”. It is acceptance of the fact that the fault not only lies with the failed managers but also the people who have chosen the failed managers. Let everybody share the blame and set a path for one of the best clubs in the world with an ever increasing fan base. Chelsea FC is a force to reckon and as much as we go through the wins and losses of the club we can do with a certain amount of faith put in a person who can provide a more permanent footing rather than a temporary one. It is funny we talk about the permanent footing. The league is now the toughest league in club football with no clear favorites for the title. There are easily 5 teams that can win the title in any given season. No club across Europe seems invincible anymore looking at Barcelona and Madrid’s fate last season where they failed to get to the Champions league final. Considering all this Roman has to think democratically rather that autocratically as to how close he wants to hang the ax to a manager’s neck. Promise of a longer leash to the next manager if the decision is carefully taken may not be the worst thing in the world. Some food for thought for the Russian baron.

Always,
A Chelsea FC fan

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The story of the storytellers

Dork: The Incredible Adventures of Robin Einstein Varghese If Chetan Bhagat didn’t do enough to inspire me and confuse me, Sidin Vadukut has just taken it to another level. Let me tell you a little bit about the “CAT” grind. Any averagely informed MBA seeker will realize that there are 6 institutes located in 6 different places of India that abbreviate to 3 letters and one has to master an entrance test, again abbreviated to three letters, to get through the portals of the apex institutes of the management world in India. Once you join a coaching centre it pretty much becomes clear that if the picture of IIM Ahmedabad does not feature next to your beloved family deities then you aren’t really serious about your classes in these institutes which will put you through a psychological toughness that is required to endure 2 hours which will largely constitute inability to answer most questions. Once you come out you feel like shit and feel much better when you see the thousand odd students ...
9 comments
Read more

Why Chelsea?

I’ve often held this grouse against Liverpool and Manchester United’s fans that when you tend to have a discussion with them they bring out the reference of the “glory” days of the clubs. Man U in some respects have continued their supremacy owing to the twin factors of a tenacious manager and some poor performances of their rivals. But Liverpool as long as I have followed the league have been very patchy. They throw in some brilliant unstoppable performances some times and play utterly clueless football at other times. There is no denying the glorious history of the club. They have been the club with the most number of premier league titles and a history that’s etched in stone and full of achievements. If anybody does begin giving me a lesson on the history of football where the club that I follow features very little in, one would still find an ardent listener in me, because ‘we love this game'. But to all those people who have followed the glory days of Arsenal and Liverpool,...
3 comments
Read more

Have you been a victim of attraction?

Have you been a victim of attraction? It is so tempting that even if u are made of steel, u’ve got to sway. It’s irresistible. It is seductive. It keeps luring you away. Attraction is usually for something, for example you are attracted to a particular object or person. Attainment of the same isn’t half as fulfilling as what attraction does to us. That’s why Hope is such a wonderful thing. It keeps us in a dream land of belief that someday things will change. The concept of some day is so fantastic that it, in most cases, will lead you to inaction. The “some day” has to be created by you. Hoping is just the odor. The actual thing is the source of the sweetness. Odor just has a marijuana effect, hence fighting it is tremendously difficult. You need guts to overcome the lure of attraction. It is fancy to dream big but if you don’t know your route to achievement then your dream is just a movie that has flown you away one minute and crash lands you the next. But attraction in itself isn’...
2 comments
Read more