Go stand in front of the mirror. What do you see? Describe that
person. How accurately can you describe him/her? Is your description right? According
to who? You?
We live in a world where there are absolutes and relatives. The
absolutes make our lives better. For example science and technology. The relatives
keep us hungry. For example, the need to be better, the need to be appreciated,
the need to be included. The absolutes set you on a quest where you can find
gold at your destination. The relatives will set you on a quest where you will
find just another quest at the destination. What’s more important? Should we
put our trust in the absolutes only or should we put our trust in the ongoing
quest of relatives? I don’t really know. I guess, there is no absolute answer
to it.
What do you see in that mirror? If you see a guy or a girl
with hair on the head, a nose in the middle, 2lips, 2 eyes and 2 ears, you see
the absolute. If you see a person who is beautiful, a person who has full lips
and eyes that are kind or sensuous and cheeks that are red then you see the
relative.
The other question is who are you, really? The definition of
you is according to who? Are you the way you look at you? Are you the way your
spouse looks at you or are you the person the way your mom looks at you? Are you
what your friends think of you? Or are you what an extensive report made by a
psychoanalyst says about you?
Let’s say the psychoanalyst has the most accurate picture of
you, as is. It takes absolutely no time from going to as is to as you want to
be. So how accurate is it? Then is the quest of who you are, worth it?
Comments